The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness
The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness Ru'a Ghazi Mohammad Amin Sendi. Sharia Department, College of Sharia and Law, Jeddah University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Email: rgsendi@uj.edu.sa Abstract:
This research is submitted to the Fifth International Scientific Conference of the College of Islamic and Arabic Studies (Ethics...and Mechanisms for Building Sound Awareness). It aims to differentiate between the two fundamental rules related to the prohibition of the opposite action and the prohibition of something by commanding its opposite, and their impact on building ethical awareness. The research followed the method of editing the doctrinal differences and their effects, clarifying the disagreement in them, and mentioning the most important evidence briefly. It mentions the effects of the doctrinal differences in the branches, discussing them concisely, referring to the original sources during the study of the topics, and structuring the research with an introduction, three sections, conclusion, and indexes. Among its most important results is clarifying the differences between the two rules, emphasizing the necessity of building ethical awareness among traders and consumers in areas related to transactions such as fraudulent transactions, selling what one does not own, and monopolizing. The study highlighted the importance of building ethical awareness among the general public in matters related to personal status branches such as marriage, divorce, and engagement.
Sendi, R. G. M. A. .. (2024). The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness. Al-Zahraa, 34(2), 1651-1703. doi: 10.21608/zjac.2024.423361
MLA
Ru'a Ghazi Mohammad Amin . Sendi. "The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness", Al-Zahraa, 34, 2, 2024, 1651-1703. doi: 10.21608/zjac.2024.423361
HARVARD
Sendi, R. G. M. A. .. (2024). 'The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness', Al-Zahraa, 34(2), pp. 1651-1703. doi: 10.21608/zjac.2024.423361
VANCOUVER
Sendi, R. G. M. A. .. The Fundamental Distinction between the Principles of “The Prohibition of an Action Implies Doing Its Opposite” and “The Prohibition of Something is a Command for Its Opposite,” and Its Impact on Building Ethical Awareness. Al-Zahraa, 2024; 34(2): 1651-1703. doi: 10.21608/zjac.2024.423361
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO